Location: Orbiting Earth

Ever since the original 'The Night Sky" came out, this topic has caught my eye, and been interesting. It all but disappeared from the web a few years ago... But now it appears to have renewed interest. It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the Moon is not what it appears; that it is not just another satellite orbiting a planet, Earth, but an entity which has thrown the minds of some of the greatest thinkers and scientific brains into a quandary and bewilderment unprecedented in the history of astronomy. Why haven't you heard about this? Another government cover-up? How could Moon mysteries have anything to do with government secrecy, and moreover could it relate to the suppression of the space program?
Let us outline some of the extraordinary anomalies and mysteries surrounding this puzzle. Clearly not all data will be equally reliable but the abundance of interrelated information nevertheless gives an overall picture which can be determined with some certainty. The first academic enigma must surely be that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size. However, this would presumably be based on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with 5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow. Eminent scientist Carl Sagan, a typical sceptic, made the statement, 'A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object'. But meaning here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite, and therefore artificial.
Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow object' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. The same effect occurred with Apollo 13's third stage which caused the Moon to ring for over 4 hours. So what's going on with the Moon?
Two Soviet scientists, Vasin & Shcherbokov, have spent much of their careers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their conclusion is that the Moon is artificial, possibly a hollowed-out planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of the galaxy into a circular orbit around our planet ( hence the extraordinary mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations ). They claim that intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons.
In 1968, as Apollo 8 moved into orbit around the Moon, the astronauts spotted a colossal extraterrestrial object, which then had disappeared on the next orbit. Photographs were taken, of course, but not released to the public. On another occasion when the lunar excursion module was down to 4-5 miles from the Moon's surface astronauts witnessed a UFO suddenly rise from a crater and rapidly disappear. In 1969 Aldrin was checking the lunar surface from orbit, when two UFO's appeared, moved towards the Apollo rocket, hovered nearby, then to Aldrin's utter astonishment the UFO's joined to form one entity. Furthermore, astronauts of Apollo 11 saw a spacefleet of UFO's lined up in a crater. Almost every Moon mission involved encounters with UFO's or a UFO sighting, not to mention the discovery of many bases on the Moon's surface. Renowned astronomer Patrick Moore discovered over 100 dome-like buildings. In fact, about 1000 such bases, dome-like structures of diameter around 700', have been witnessed. Astronomy records extending back 200 years indicate no such artifacts until about the 1950's. Many of the UFO encounters by the astronauts were stated to be of a positive nature in which unintrusive assistance was given.
It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal, which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick, mostly metal. Note that mascons ( higher concentrations of mass ) found in the marias cause fluctuations in gravity and have never been satisfactorily explained.
Moreover, these structural anomalies were supported by two publications, one Time Magazine, which unwittingly revealed the gravity value of the Moon relative to Earth by publishing the distance from Earth to Moon of the null point between them, indicating a gravitational force some 60 -70% of Earth. Furthermore, some people noticed the feeble plumage of the rocket exhaust as the module rose from the Moon's surface, explained away by NASA as due to the vacuum. But what about some of the telltale and suspicious features observed during the first Armstrong and Aldrin Moon landing. The American flag was seen briefly to wave in a breeze? But we are told there is no air on the Moon. The flag was then starched. Also we saw dust kicked up by the astronauts clearly drifting in what? Dust particles do not drift in vacuum, they cling together. And what about the feeble leaps of the astronauts off the Moon's surface, were their space suits and backpacks really so heavy? The Moon is supposed to be about 16% the gravity of Earth.
Thus we now know that air is present, and the feeble rocket exhaust could not be due to a vacuum. Moreover, the exhaust was apparently too weak to account for the necessary power to escape from such a gravitational pull in relationship to the size of the module, which was not large enough to contain the necessary fuel to escape the Moon's high gravity. Was antigravity propulsion secretly being used as a booster?
The covert government have long since sent 'astronauts' into outer space in antigravity spacecrafts. They apparently had the so-called cosmospheres about 40 years ago, some larger than the old and massive dirigibles. They seized the antigravity research data from the Nazis, and have since then reverse engineered captured spacecrafts and negotiated deals with aliens involving antigravity technologies.
The more thorough have been the investigations of the Moon the more bizarre the results have been. Probably one of the most startling was that moonquakes occurred like clockwork. Moreover, the fluctuations on each occasion were the same. This is impossible for natural conditions which always obey fractal distributions. Furthermore, a study of rock samples reveal an age of 5.3 billion years, and that not only is the Moon older than the Earth, estimated to be about 4.6 billion years, but that it is older than the solar system ( and by theoretical standards as old as the universe ).
What about the surface of the Moon? Several television viewers wrote explaining that they spotted one of the astronauts pick up what appeared to be a glass bottle and remark, 'My God, I don't believe it, look at this ... ' Then the television screen went blank. Other viewers observed the extreme difficulty astronauts had when drilling down a few inches into the Moon's marias and that when the drill bit was pulled out, metal shavings were visible. Rocks were found to contain brass, mica, titanium, and elements uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 not previously found in nature.
Astronomy literature reports the sighting of a 12-mile bridge-like structure over the Sea of Crisis in 1954 by John O'Neile, and in the 1950's astronomer Jessup realized that UFO's had bases on the Moon ( and so does the government of course ). Other strange lunar phenomena are: the observation by Dr. Frank Harris of a black body on the surface, 250 miles long and 50 miles wide; clouds and lightning; strange moving shadows and objects, and spire-like structures thousands of feet high; a huge boulder with tracks ( behind it ) from inside a crater to the rim ( uphill ); the shrinking, over a period of time, of the crater Luna from 6 miles in diameter to 1.5 miles; 'hill' effects in craters appearing and disappearing in a few hours; over 800 substantial observations made by scientists of blinking and flashing lights; the results of NASA photographs of the lunar surface, indicating several large pyramid structures, strange rifts in the surface with entrances, massive girders, machinery and some 0.62 mile blocks of metal, tears in the surface, revealing massive interior 'plumbing', huge crosses a mile long, and enormous excavating equipment. Professional astronomers have gradually been discouraged from investigating these observations, referred to as Transient Lunar Phenomena, and all such Fortean observations are now only of interest to the amateur.
Our satellite has long since been established as being extremely dry but this information has been contradicted by the appearance of clouds on the surface. On one occasion a cloud of water vapour appeared covering more than 100 square miles. And it has been reported that strange clouds appear at lightning speed. The capture theory that the Moon was pulled into its orbit by the Earth was once favored but the circular orbit of the Moon invalidated it. As already mentioned the Moon is the wrong size and in the wrong orbit. It is too big and too far out. It does not rotate relative to Earth; the same side always faces the Earth. And what about the amazing 'coincidence' of the eclipse phenomenon. The position and size of the Moon is precisely that necessary to eclipse the Sun's disc.
Scientific experts, including NASA investigators believe that the Moon is hollow, it is the only explanation. The velocity of sound has been found to increase with depth and at 40 miles it is too fast for the speed of propagation through rock substance. 'Spaceship Moon' is the brainchild of the two Soviet researchers but many others agree with the theory, including NASA scientists at JPL and an Oxford University physicist. The capture theory is now back in favour but with a significant adjustment that the Moon was steered into orbit.
It might be worth a comment on the recent 'conspiracy theory' that astronauts never actually went to the Moon. DVDs and television programs have proffered that, in particular, photographs allegedly taken on the Moon were faked. In fact one can see clearly in the photographs that the shadows of objects on the Moon were not parallel as they would be if the shadows were cast by the Sun, rather than by studio lighting. Further evidence has been given. But we may know from earlier suspicions that NASA has a propensity for faking scenes, for example, the view of the interior of the shuttle faking an outer-space mission when actually on the ground. Thus the conclusion, is that both scenarios are correct: astronauts did land on the Moon, and NASA has produced faked photographs.
Was the space programme cut because further encounters with UFO's might blow the government cover-up? Even more important than this, allowing the public to increase their confront and interest in the subject of extraterrestrials would eventually lead to a worldwide awakening of the human race's true heritage, the causes of our downfall, the falsification of our history, and ultimately the disclosure and eradication of the control mechanism.
We see that the Moon mysteries are intimately bound up with an extraterrestrial sighting or involvement, in particular, the conclusion of the two Russian scientists that the Moon is artificial and hollow. Is this a favorable omen for the human race or a harbinger of something more ominous. Why was the Moon directed to retain continuously a dark side? A side of the Moon we never see. Also police records referring to increased crime during the full Moon are commonplace. A study of ET material of which literature today abounds, strongly indicates that the nature of the Moon has a sinister purpose and plays a role in manipulating man's evolution.
In fact, if we include relevant data from extraterrestrial material transmitted by Ashayana Deane, taken from a now vast body of advanced scientific knowledge about the universe, life and man's downfall, it is made clear that the Moon is another of the many components of the Beast machine, and does indeed play a sinister role. The natural matter of the Moon came from a very large planet, Maldek ( or Marduk ), which orbited our Sun thousands of years ago between Mars and Jupiter. It was inhabited by a thriving civilization which degenerated to such a degree that the planet was destroyed. The asteroid belt is a product of the many fragments; also Wormwood ( Bible ), referred to as Battlestar Wormwood by ET's ( see Planet X article ).
We can tentatively assume now that the Moon consists of a metallic framework which has been packed by pieces from Maldek, forming the spherical shape but is essentially hollow. Similarly for Wormwood. Thus the Moon contains energies and coding (frequency patterns) supporting the original ET agenda for assimilation of our planetary system and in fact the whole time matrix. Further programs emanate from the moon, such as one to cause unnatural hormonal/menstrual cycles in women to produce more children, thus losing control over when to have children. The purpose being to keep a plentiful stock of DNA for their genetic experiments ( the human DNA, that is, its original template is valuable to these spiritually-fallen ET's ).
In fact, not only does the Moon affect the tides of Earth but the blood in living organisms. A separate source of information ( channelling ) refers to the Moon as being an electromagnetic computer which can be programmed intelligently, such as to influence the feminine cycle, and has been transmitting signals to maintain our DNA for aeons.
Strange lights and objects have been recorded on our moon for hundreds of years. In 1787, legendary astronomer, Sir William Herschel, recorded strange lights traveling across the dark lunar surface. On one particular occasion of that same year, he spotted 3 red lights in the darkness of the lunar surface, describing the brightest one as being brighter than a recently discovered comet. He also believed there to be large "lunar cities" within the moon's craters and strongly believed in extraterrestrial life, something almost laughable during the 18th century.
The classical Greek philosopher, mathematician and scientist Plato also reported anomalous lights on the moon sometime around 400 BC. There is even a crater named after him which experiences high volumes of 'transient lunar phenomenon', a term that NASA uses to describe these spooky lunar lights. Between the years of 1540 and 1967, 570+ lights & flashes were recorded over the moon's face. While NASA and other lunar scientists attribute these moving and flashing lights to outgassing and impacts, few reports concerning these phenomena are ever published in peer reviewed scientific journals and are rarely ever discussed among the scientific community.
So could great historical minds like Sir William Herschel have been correct? Could it really be possible for a race of extraterrestrials to have been living on our moon for hundreds or thousands of years without public knowledge on Earth?
There are several official NASA photos taken throughout it's lunar expeditions which often depict some extremely large, artificial-looking, structures on the lunar surface. Some of these structures have been estimated to be several miles tall. However, NASA has tried their best over the years to blur and obscure many of these structures. Often their attempts are extremely blatant.
So now we've got some evidence of moving luminous objects and large structures on the moon's surface, and furthermore, that NASA is trying very hard to hide and explain away these things. But what else can we look at? How about the moon's interior? If an extraterrestrial race is hiding on the moon, wouldn't the interior would be the safest and most reclusive spot to hide?
In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon McDonald stated in Astronautics magazine; "...according to an analysis of the moon's motion, it appears that the moon is hollow: if the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is less dense than the outer parts. Indeed, it would seem that the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere."
In a March 1970 article of Popular Science titled 'How APOLLO 13 Will Probe the Moon's Interior', former SS Nazi & director at NASA, Dr. Wernher von Braun wrote, concerning the crash of Apollo 12's 2.5 ton Lunar Module into the lunar surface; "The astounding result of that crash: The moon rang like a bell for nearly an hour, indicating some strange and unearthly underground structure."
In that same article, published a month before Apollo 13's failed lunar landing, von Braun goes on to say; "An Apollo 13 "spectacular" will be the meteor-like crash on the moon of the great Saturn V rocket's whole top stage and instrument unit, totaling more than 15 tons...This will be a dramatic scale-up of the Apollo 12 experiment." Indeed it was. Despite technical malfunctions preventing the Apollo 13 crew from landing on the moon, they still managed to carry out the task of crashing the Saturn V third stage rocket (S-IV B) into it. This time the moon rang out for over 3 hours! Back at NASA headquarters in Houston, CAPCOM made this remark to the Apollo 13 astronauts after impact; "Aquarius, we see the results now from 12's seismometer. Looks like your booster just hit the Moon, and it's rocking a little bit."
However more recently, based on new 'state-of-the-art' seismological analysis of the same Apollo-era data, NASA has concluded that the moon is not hollow, but rather has an 'Earth-like core' made up of mostly mantle with a solid inner core surrounded by a fluid outer core. So why then, did it ring like a bell for over 3 hours!?
Many scientists opposed to the idea of a hollow moon argue that the lunar crust would have to be extremely dense in order to support the theory, based on the behavior of objects interacting with the moon's gravitational field. This is something that makes sense, if you are thinking in context of the moon being a 100% natural body. One thing you have to take into account though, is that scientist to this day still have no solid claims as to where the moon actually came from.
As a believer, I remember back in the 90's with the original Night Sky, much of the information pointed to maybe it is a type of rescue/excape vessel for when we finally finish off this planet. My thought has always been... Just maybe it's an oversized cattle truck. Shipping us off to market when our time here is up.